论行政前置对拒不支付劳动报酬罪犯罪构成的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


A Study of the Impact of the Preposed Administrative Procedure on the Crime of Refusing to Pay Labor Remuneration
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    《刑法修正案(八)》将情节严重的拒不支付劳动报酬的行为规定为犯罪,立法旨在于通过这 种严厉的刑罚措施,对劳动者的合法权益进行更好的保护。肯定的是,欠薪入罪能够从某种程度上缓解用人单 位不支付劳动报酬的问题,但是由于社会关系尤其是劳动关系的复杂性以及拒不支付劳动报酬罪司法实践中遇 到的各种问题,如行政机关工作的不确定性,行政机关和司法机关的工作衔接的不稳定性,该立法并未能更好 地对劳动者权益进行保护。行政前置具有何种地位、有关部门如何界定、责令的方式和性质如何确定,都是拒 不支付劳动报酬罪中值得研究的问题。“行政前置”的增设从某种程度上来说存在不合理处。

    Abstract:

    The Amendment (eight) of the Criminal Law sets the serious act of refusing to pay labor remuneration as a crime. The legislative intent is to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of laborers through this severe criminal law measure. This legislative regulation, to a certain extent, can surely restrain employers' act of refusing to pay labor remunerations. However, due to the complexity of social relations, especially labor relations, and the issues in the judicial practice regarding the crime of refusing to pay labor remuneration such as the unclear work scope of administrative organs, the instability of coordination between administrative and judicial organs, this legislation does not fully protect laborers' rights and interests. The issues like the status of preposed administrative procedure, definition of the procedure by relevant departments, fixing of the way and characteristics of order and so on need to be examined regrading the crime refusing to pay labor remuneration. To a certain extent, the superimposition of preposed administrative procedure in the Amendment is unreasonable.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

罗 军.论行政前置对拒不支付劳动报酬罪犯罪构成的影响[J].中国劳动关系学院,2018,32(4):61-69.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-05-22
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码