劳动争议大调解制度与实践研究
CSTR:
作者:

The Labor Dispute Mediation System and Practice Research
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    调解能够比较及时有效地处理争议,使其化解于诉讼之前或之外。研究将劳动争议调解分为两类: 一是“小调解”,二是大调解。大调解又分为一般大调解和特殊大调解。大调解的法理基础主要是劳动政策层面, 由于在对其法定性问题的认识上分歧严重,使得大调解在学界和实践中都有很大争论并延伸到劳动争议中来。 实践中已经出现了一些劳动争议之特殊大调解成功模式,如“山东模式”“天津模式”,为大调解之合理性提 供了有力证明和支撑,也为大调解在劳动争议特别是集体劳动争议中的广泛实施,提供了可行性的实践范式。

    Abstract:

    The mediation can deal with disputes in a timely and effective manner so that it can be resolved before or outside the lawsuit. The study divides labor disputes mediation into two categories: one is small mediation, the other is large mediation. The latter can also be divided into general mediation and special mediation. The legal basis of the large mediation is mainly at the level of labor policy since its statutory issues are seriously divided, which causes great controversy in academic circles and practice, and hence, extends to labor disputes. In practice, some special models are available for successful major mediation of labor disputes, such as the "Shandong Model" and the "Tianjin Model'*, which provides strong proof and support for the rationality of the major mediation, and a feasible practical paradigm of the major mediation in labor disputes as well, in particular collective labor disputes' extensive implementation in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

问清泓.劳动争议大调解制度与实践研究[J].中国劳动关系学院,2020,34(3):1-13.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-04-25
文章二维码