Abstract:Labor dispute arbitration belongs to statutory arbitration under the socialist harmonious labor relations discourse system, whilst it has no institutional relevance to commercial arbitration based on civil consensus and autonomy. The research believes that the non-enforcement of labor dispute arbitration award is a relief method based on the final nature of the agreement arbitration. It should not be applied to labor dispute arbitration as a pre-litigation procedure, and it is easy to cause repeated relief a disadvantage for efficiency and protection. The pursuit of the value of the laborer causes loss. The relevant judicial interpretation creates a supervision procedure for the non-implementation of labor dispute arbitration award for the pursuit of social effects, which confuses the boundaries between statutory arbitration and agreement arbitration, and expands the application of Article 237 of the Civil Procedure Law Scope. Thus, it is easy to bring about legal conflicts and application dilemma. The research insists that judicial review of labor dispute arbitration awards must respect their public law attributes, strictly follow the law1 s express provisions, and make judgments in accordance with the remedies granted by law.
